DiMaggio v. Cicotti

179 A.D.2d 1092
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 1992·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Memorandum: The Oneida County Board of Elections failed to follow statutory procedure when it canceled the registration of a voter who had successfully applied for a military ballot (Election Law § 10-109 [3], [6]). Further, respondent’s arguments that the voter was not qualified to vote in the First Ward of Rome are without merit. The voter, a technical sergeant in the Air Force, lived in the First Ward for seven years while stationed at Griffiss Air Force Base. Although he is now stationed in Texas, he files a New York State Tax return and he unequivocally states his intention to return to [1093] Rome when he retires from the military. He is thus qualified to vote as a resident of Rome (Matter of Altimari v Meisser, 16 NY2d 629, revg 23 AD2d 865, affg 45 Misc 2d 1008). Thus, Supreme Court properly ordered the ballot canvassed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.— Election Law.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Doerr, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 15, 1992.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DiMaggio v. Cicotti, 179 A.D.2d 1092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 1092 (DiMaggio v. Cicotti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Altimari v. Meisser
209 N.E.2d 115 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Altimari v. Meisser
23 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Altimari v. Meisser
45 Misc. 2d 1008 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)