Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy

Eighth Circuit

Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy

619 F. App'x 568

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 2015

Docket14-3515

StatusUnpublished

This text of 619 F. App'x 568 (Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy, 619 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dim Njaka appeals the district court’s 3 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his lawsuit under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act. Upon de novo review, see Hopkins v. City of Bloomington, 774 F.3d 490, 491-92 (8th Cir.2014), we agree with the district court that *569 dismissal was proper. We deny as moot his challenge to the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. The judgment of the district court is áffírmed. 4 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

3

.The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.

4

. We decline to address the new. matters and evidence Njaka offers on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dim Njaka appeals the district court’s 3 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his lawsuit under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act. Upon de novo review, see Hopkins v. City of Bloomington, 774 F.3d 490, 491-92 (8th Cir.2014), we agree with the district court that *569 dismissal was proper. We deny as moot his challenge to the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. The judgment of the district court is áffírmed. 4 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

3

.The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.

4

. We decline to address the new. matters and evidence Njaka offers on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.2004).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dim-njaka-v-michael-d-kennedy-ca8-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack