Dilworth v. Ed. Steves & Sons

174 S.W. 279, 107 Tex. 73
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 1915
DocketApplication No. 9069.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 174 S.W. 279 (Dilworth v. Ed. Steves & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dilworth v. Ed. Steves & Sons, 174 S.W. 279, 107 Tex. 73 (Tex. 1915).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, J.

The case was tried in the district court of Bexar county for the Seventy-Third judicial district at a term beginning October 6, 1913, and ending November 29, 1913, and which could not by law continue more than eight weeks. The appeal bond of the plaintiffs in error was filed in the trial court December 29, 1913, more than 20 days after the expiration of the term. It was therefore filed too late. R. S. art. 2084. The matter does not appear to have been brought to the attention of the Court of Civil Appeals; but, the bond not having been filed in time, it was without jurisdiction of the appeal, as is this court of the application for writ of error, which is accordingly dismissed. El Paso & Northeastern Railway Co. v. Whatley, 99 Tex. 128, 87 S.W. 819.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allee v. Breteul
142 S.W.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Kunz v. Vahrenkamp
93 S.W.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Brazell v. Irene Independent School Dist.
276 S.W. 1108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.W. 279, 107 Tex. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilworth-v-ed-steves-sons-tex-1915.