DiLucia v. Mandelker
501 N.E.2d 32, 68 N.Y.2d 844, 508 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20534
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in so much of the opinion by Justice Arnold L. Fein at the Appellate Division as held that campaign contributions are not gifts within the meaning of New York City Charter § 2604 (110 AD2d 260).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DiLucia v. Mandelker, 501 N.E.2d 32, 68 N.Y.2d 844, 508 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20534 (N.Y. 1986).
501 N.E.2d 32 (DiLucia v. Mandelker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Molinari v. Bloomberg
564 F.3d 587 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Dunlop Development Corp. v. Spitzer
26 A.D.3d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 2005
Byer v. Town of Poestenkill
232 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Parker v. Town of Gardiner Planning Board
184 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)