Diltz v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Diltz v. United States

45 F. App'x 256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 4, 2002

DocketNo. 02-1562

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F. App'x 256 (Diltz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diltz v. United States, 45 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pamela J. Diltz appeals the district court’s orders granting the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons and denying Diltz’s motions for clarification and injunctive relief. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Diltz v. United States, No. CA-02-7-1-T (W.D.N.C. May 1 & May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pamela J. Diltz appeals the district court’s orders granting the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons and denying Diltz’s motions for clarification and injunctive relief. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Diltz v. United States, No. CA-02-7-1-T (W.D.N.C. May 1 & May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diltz-v-united-states-ca4-2002.