Dillon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dillon v. State

841 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4051, 2003 WL 1523552

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-4092

StatusPublished

This text of 841 So. 2d 579 (Dillon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dillon v. State, 841 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4051, 2003 WL 1523552 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Darrin C. Dillon appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Dillon claims that his sentence is illegal under this court’s decision in Tay[580]*580lor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).¹ Dillon’s claim is facially insufficient as he does not claim that his date of offense is within the window created by Taylor. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Dillon’s filing a facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLY, Judge.

Darrin C. Dillon appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Dillon claims that his sentence is illegal under this court’s decision in Tay[580]*580lor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).¹ Dillon’s claim is facially insufficient as he does not claim that his date of offense is within the window created by Taylor. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Dillon’s filing a facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4051, 2003 WL 1523552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillon-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack