Dillon v. Roberts
This text of 274 A.D. 911 (Dillon v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified by eliminating from the decretal provisions of the order paragraph “ 2 ” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents upon the ground that petitioners are not aggrieved parties. Permission is hereby granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [193 Misc. 6.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 911, 83 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillon-v-roberts-nyappdiv-1948.