Dillon v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dillon v. Power

19 A.D.2d 780, 242 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 780 (Dillon v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dillon v. Power, 19 A.D.2d 780, 242 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered August 27, 1963, dismissing the petition under section 330 of the Election Law, unanimously modified on the law to reinstate the designating petitions in those Election Districts which were invalidated solely because not consecutively numbered and where a single sheet contained sufficient signatures and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. From the chart appearing in the brief, the Election Districts referred to are as follows: 64, 74, 75, 77, 78, 80 to 88, inclusive, 90, 91, 93 to 96, inclusive, 98, 99 and 103 to 108, inclusive. Since the designating petitions in the Election Districts enumerated contained single sheets including sufficient signatures to support the designation, these petitions are held to sufficiently comply with the statutory requirements. (See Election Law, § 135; Matter of Fleischman, 14 A D 2d 600, affd. 10 N Y 2d 804.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered August 27, 1963, dismissing the petition under section 330 of the Election Law, unanimously modified on the law to reinstate the designating petitions in those Election Districts which were invalidated solely because not consecutively numbered and where a single sheet contained sufficient signatures and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. From the chart appearing in the brief, the Election Districts referred to are as follows: 64, 74, 75, 77, 78, 80 to 88, inclusive, 90, 91, 93 to 96, inclusive, 98, 99 and 103 to 108, inclusive. Since the designating petitions in the Election Districts enumerated contained single sheets including sufficient signatures to support the designation, these petitions are held to sufficiently comply with the statutory requirements. (See Election Law, § 135; Matter of Fleischman, 14 A D 2d 600, affd. 10 N Y 2d 804.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 780, 242 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillon-v-power-nyappdiv-1963.