Dillon Catfish Drainage District v. Bank of Dillon
141 S.E. 274, 143 S.C. 178, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 9
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The decree of his Honor, Judge M. M. Mann, which will be reported, states fully the facts of this cause, and the conclusions reached by him are satisfactory to this Court.
It is therefore ordered that the decree appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dillon Catfish Drainage District v. Bank of Dillon, 141 S.E. 274, 143 S.C. 178, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 9 (S.C. 1928).
141 S.E. 274 (Dillon Catfish Drainage District v. Bank of Dillon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Wiggins
126 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1962)
Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
59 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Sanders v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.
44 S.E.2d 185 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)
Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
181 S.E. 481 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Blake
20 P.2d 871 (Utah Supreme Court, 1933)
Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. State
21 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)