Dillingham v. State
262 So. 2d 241, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6728
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Nickels v. State, 90 Fla. 659, 106 So. 479; Holland v. State, 129 Fla. 363, 176 So. 169; Victor v. State, 141 Fla. 508, 193 So. 762; Payton v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 255; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21; Baker v. State, Fla.1970, 241 So.2d 683; see also: Miller v. United States, 5th Cir. 1942, 126 F.2d 771; Conyers v. Wainwright, S.D.Fla.1970, 309 F.Supp. 1101.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dillingham v. State, 262 So. 2d 241, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
262 So. 2d 241 (Dillingham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feldman v. State
212 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Baker v. State
241 So. 2d 683 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Nickels v. State
106 So. 479 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Victor v. State
193 So. 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Holland v. State
176 So. 169 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Miller v. United States
126 F.2d 771 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)
Payton v. State
200 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Conyers v. Wainwright
309 F. Supp. 1101 (S.D. Florida, 1970)