Dillingham v. Skillings

997 P.2d 296, 166 Or. App. 129, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 353
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 8, 2000
Docket98-02-0279C; CA A104073
StatusPublished

This text of 997 P.2d 296 (Dillingham v. Skillings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dillingham v. Skillings, 997 P.2d 296, 166 Or. App. 129, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 353 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

KISTLER, J.

In this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action, the trial court entered judgment in landlord’s favor because tenant had not given landlord written notice of the conditions that gave rise to her affirmative defense. We reverse and remand.

ORS chapter 90 provides residential tenants with rights that may be asserted in an FED action. Edwards v. Fenn, 308 Or 129, 134, 775 P2d 1375 (1989). Some rights require written notice. L & M Investment Co. v. Morrison, 286 Or 397, 405-07, 594 P2d 1238 (1979). Others do not. Id. ORS 90.360(2) falls in the latter category. It authorizes a tenant to recover damages if the landlord fails to comply with the rental agreement or ORS 90.320. A tenant’s right to recover damages under ORS 90.360(2) may be asserted as an affirmative defense to an FED action, see Edwards, 308 at 134,1 but it may not be enforced if, among other things, “the landlord neither knew nor reasonably should have known of the condition that constituted noncompliance[,]” ORS 90.360(2).2

In this case, the trial court did not permit tenant to put on any evidence to support her affirmative defense once it determined that she had not given written notice. Because no written notice was required to assert a defense under ORS [132]*13290.360(2), we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this decision.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. Fenn
775 P.2d 1375 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
L & M Investment Co. v. Morrison
594 P.2d 1238 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 P.2d 296, 166 Or. App. 129, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillingham-v-skillings-orctapp-2000.