Dillingham v. Richards

28 S.W. 272, 87 Tex. 247, 1894 Tex. LEXIS 377
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1894·No. No. 431.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is an application for a writ of error, in which the only ground alleged for the granting of the writ is, that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in not holding that the damages awarded by the verdict of the jury were excessive. The action was brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while a passenger on a railroad operated by the defendant, as receiver. The damages claimed were for pain, loss of capacity to earn money, permanent physical disability, etc., resulting from the injuries inflicted. The amount of pecuniary compensation for such damages is a matter peculiarly within the province of the jury. The question of such amount is necessarily a question of fact, over which this court has no jurisdiction. Our jurisdiction extends to questions of law only. Section 3 of article 5 of the Constitution, as amended in 1891.

The application for the writ of error is accordingly dismissed.

Application, dismissed.

Delivered October 18, 1894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dillingham v. Richards, 28 S.W. 272, 87 Tex. 247, 1894 Tex. LEXIS 377 (Tex. 1894).

28 S.W. 272 (Dillingham v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Compress Co. v. Hamlin
269 S.W. 1024 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)
Leaverton v. Chapman
114 Tex. 376 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)
Terhune v. First National Bank
60 S.W. 352 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1900)