Dillingham v. Blue Ridge Motors, Inc.
This text of 66 S.E.2d 641 (Dillingham v. Blue Ridge Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff merely excepted to the judgment below and assigned as error the court’s “findings of fact and conclusions of law as set out in said judgment.” This assignment of error is broadside. The exception and assignment bring up only the question whether the facts found support the judgment. Bailey v. McPherson, 233 N.C. 231, 63 S.E. 2d 559; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351. The Judge below found as facts that the plaintiff failed to establish either (1) mistake, surprise, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or (2) that he has a meritorious defense to the counterclaim within the purview of G.S. 1-220. These findings support the judgment. No error appears on the face of the record. Therefore, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E.2d 641, 234 N.C. 171, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillingham-v-blue-ridge-motors-inc-nc-1951.