Dillingham v. Bakley

152 F. 1022, 82 C.C.A. 659, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4368
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1907·No. No. 701·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the questions involved in this case, and' we find no error in the rulings of the learned judge who tried the case below. Therefore we affirm the judgment of the court below, fully concurring in the opinion, which is to be found in 148 Fed. 56.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dillingham v. Bakley, 152 F. 1022, 82 C.C.A. 659, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4368 (4th Cir. 1907).

152 F. 1022 (Dillingham v. Bakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Avery
235 F. 248 (E.D. North Carolina, 1916)
Ex parte Dunakin
202 F. 290 (E.D. Kentucky, 1913)