Dillinger v. Jamell Contractors LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
MISTY DILLINGER PLAINTIFF
No. 4:22-cv-1097-DPM
JAMELL CONTRACTORS LLC DEFENDANT
ORDER The joint motion, Doc. 29, is granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 1027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute. And the attorney’s fee, though allocated in the settlement agreement, was negotiated separately. The Court will dismiss the complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the settlement. So Ordered.
VPviqustsll D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3! Mary Qwat
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dillinger v. Jamell Contractors LLC (Dillinger v. Jamell Contractors LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.