Diller v. Evans
This text of 96 A.D.2d 1017 (Diller v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Application for a writ of mandamus (denominated a writ of prohibition in the moving papers), deemed to be one for leave to appeal to this court from the denial of a postjudgment motion, and said application referred to Justice Sidney H. Asch for hearing and determination. [See 96 AD2d 1017.] Concur — Sandler, J. P., Asch, Silverman, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diller-v-evans-nyappdiv-1983.