Dillenbeck v. Bailey
This text of 32 A.D.2d 735 (Dillenbeck v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: An appeal lies from the Special Term order granting a separate trial of the issue of liability. (CFLR 603, 5701, subd. [a], par. 2, el. [v] ; Palmer v. Socony Oil Co., 273 App. Div. 925.) Upon review thereof we hold that it was properly granted (Culley v. City of New York, 25 A D 2d 519; Mercado v. City of New York, 25 A D 2d 75). (Appeal from order of Herkimer Trial Term directing separate trial on issue of liability.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 735, 301 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillenbeck-v-bailey-nyappdiv-1969.