Dillard v. State
This text of 197 S.E.2d 924 (Dillard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only issue presented for consideration in this case concerns the admissibility of an extrajudicial confession of the defendant made on a tape recorder. At the time the taped confession was offered, the defendant’s counsel objected "That a proper foundation has not been laid for the admission into evidence of that tape.” This is the only objection argued on appeal. This has no merit. Objection on the ground of a lack of proper foundation without stating what the proper foundation should be has repeatedly been held insufficient and presents nothing for consideration on review. Freeman v. Young, 147 Ga. 699 (95 SE 236); Barkley v. State, 190 Ga. 641 (3) (10 SE2d 32); and Coleman v. State, 124 Ga. App. 313 (3) (183 SE2d 608).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 S.E.2d 924, 128 Ga. App. 747, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-state-gactapp-1973.