Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Dillard v. State

Dillard v. State

103 S.E. 714, 25 Ga. App. 402, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 838
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1920
Docket11475
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 714 (Dillard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dillard v. State, 103 S.E. 714, 25 Ga. App. 402, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 838 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The charge of the court upon the question of recent possession of stolen goods, as complained of, was not erroneous for the reason stated in Cuthbert v. State, 3 Ga. App. 600 (60 S. E. 322). See Jackson v. State, 25 Ga. App. 16 (102 S. E. 373). The charge of the court was full and fair, and the’evidence amply authorized, if indeed it did not almost demand, the conviction of the defendant. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. F. Rawls, for plaintiff in error. C. H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuthbert v. State
60 S.E. 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Jackson v. State
102 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 714, 25 Ga. App. 402, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-state-gactapp-1920.