Dillard v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
KRISHAN DILLARD, § § No. 479, 2024
Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1411003111 (N)
STATE OF DELAWARE, § §
Appellee. §
Submitted: January 21, 2025 Decided: March 20, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State of Delaware’s
motion to affirm, and the Superior Court record, we find it evident that the judgment
below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons cited by the Superior
Court in its order denying the appellant’s motion for correction of illegal sentence.1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm be
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
1 State v. Dillard, 2024 WL 4812009 (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 29, 2024) (corrected Nov. 8, 2024).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dillard v. State (Dillard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.