Dillard v. State
This text of 371 So. 2d 948 (Dillard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[949]*949AFTER REMAND
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this cause, Dillard, 371 So.2d 947, 78 184, we have reviewed the entire record and find that there was a proper Miranda warning given to the appellant, and, likewise, a proper voluntariness predicate laid before the admission of his confession. Lewis v. State, 57 Ala.App. 545, 329 So.2d 596 (1975), and authorities cited, affirmed, 295 Ala. 350, 329 So.2d 599.
We have also considered the remaining refused written requested charges and find that they were fully and adequately covered by the trial court’s oral charge or the written charges given at the request of the appellant. § 12-16-13, Code of Alabama 1975.
After careful examination, we are of the opinion that this cause is due to be
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 So. 2d 948, 1979 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-state-alacrimapp-1979.