Dillard v. State

371 So. 2d 948, 1979 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1609
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 5, 1979·No. 4 Div. 573·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[949]*949AFTER REMAND

BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Retired Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this cause, Dillard, 371 So.2d 947, 78 184, we have reviewed the entire record and find that there was a proper Miranda warning given to the appellant, and, likewise, a proper voluntariness predicate laid before the admission of his confession. Lewis v. State, 57 Ala.App. 545, 329 So.2d 596 (1975), and authorities cited, affirmed, 295 Ala. 350, 329 So.2d 599.

We have also considered the remaining refused written requested charges and find that they were fully and adequately covered by the trial court’s oral charge or the written charges given at the request of the appellant. § 12-16-13, Code of Alabama 1975.

After careful examination, we are of the opinion that this cause is due to be

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dillard v. State, 371 So. 2d 948, 1979 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1609 (Ala. Ct. App. 1979).

371 So. 2d 948 (Dillard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dillard v. State
399 So. 2d 911 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Hamilton v. City of Birmingham
396 So. 2d 120 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
White v. State
384 So. 2d 1161 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Lambeth v. State
380 So. 2d 923 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)