Dillard v. Gulf Refining Co.
This text of 125 S.E. 862 (Dillard v. Gulf Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner sought to prevent the erection of a gasoline-filling station, upon the ground that the proposed station was in close proximity to her residence,' and that the construction and maintenance of the filling station would create and constitute a nuisance which would inflict upon her damage which was incapable of being computed and which was therefore, irreparable in damages. In such a case, where the testimony is conflicting as to whether the construction and maintenance of the filling station in question at the particular location and as proposed would create a nuisance, the exercise of the discretion of the judge of the superior court will not be controlled; unless in granting or refusing an interlocutory injunction there was an abuse of his discretionary power. Applying the foregoing rule (which is well established in this court) to the evidence as set out in the record, it was not error to refuse an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 862, 159 Ga. 425, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-gulf-refining-co-ga-1924.