Dillard v. Dillard
This text of 33 S.C.L. 89 (Dillard v. Dillard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The only question which the counsel for the appellant has argued before this Court, is that embraced in the fouith ground of appeal, touching the admissibility of the testimony therein referred to; and that is the only question considered. It is quite unnecessary to multiply words upon a point so fully discussed in the Report from the Circuit: for the con[97]*97siderations therein contained, aided by the cases cited, have ■ led us to the conclusion that the Circuit Judge was right upon the matter in question, and the motion is therefore refused.
Motion dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.C.L. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-dillard-scctapp-1847.