Dillard v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Dillard v. Crocker

17 S.C. Eq. 20

DecidedDecember 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 17 S.C. Eq. 20 (Dillard v. Crocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dillard v. Crocker, 17 S.C. Eq. 20 (S.C. Ct. App. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Caria, per Dunkín, Ch.

This Court is satisfied with the conclusions of the Circuit Chancellor. But, lest some misapprehension might arise from a general affirmance of the decree, it is deemed proper to state, as the unanimous opinion of this Court, that the authority to act for the heirs of Greenberry McBee, in the proceedings before the Ordinary, could not be properly questioned, on a collateral issue, in a controversy between third persons. With this explanation, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

D. Johnson, and J. Johnston, Chancellors, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caria, per Dunkín, Ch.

This Court is satisfied with the conclusions of the Circuit Chancellor. But, lest some misapprehension might arise from a general affirmance of the decree, it is deemed proper to state, as the unanimous opinion of this Court, that the authority to act for the heirs of Greenberry McBee, in the proceedings before the Ordinary, could not be properly questioned, on a collateral issue, in a controversy between third persons. With this explanation, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

D. Johnson, and J. Johnston, Chancellors, concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.C. Eq. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-crocker-scctapp-1842.