Dillard v. Bryant
This text of 13 F. App'x 490 (Dillard v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vernon K. Dillard, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the District Court’s1 denial of [491]*491his post-judgment motions to set aside the judgment and to amend his complaint, and for summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we hold that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying what were in effect Dillard’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motions, as without merit. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.2001) (appellate court reviews district court’s denial of relief under Rule 60(b) only for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. App'x 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-v-bryant-ca8-2001.