Dillard, Steven Dale

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 2023
DocketWR-28,231-05
StatusPublished

This text of Dillard, Steven Dale (Dillard, Steven Dale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dillard, Steven Dale, (Tex. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-28,231-05

EX PARTE STEVEN DALE DILLARD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 8104-HC-5 IN THE 1ST DISTRICT COURT FROM JASPER COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was not given a hearing before his parole release was revoked.

Ex parte Cordova, 235 S.W.3d 735, 736 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (citing TEX. GOV'T CODE §

508.2811); see also Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 485 (1972) (discussed in Ex parte Taylor,

957 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial

court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The

trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a 2

response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court

may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this

Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall also state whether Applicant received, prior to revocation:

(1) A preliminary hearing within a reasonable time;

(2) Written notice of the claimed violations of parole;

(3) Disclosure of the evidence against him;

(4) The opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary

evidence;

(5) The right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses;

(6) A “neutral and detached” hearing body; and

(7) A written statement by the fact finder as to the evidence relied on and reasons for

revoking parole.

The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in

response to Applicant’s allegations.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from 3

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 11, 2023 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Ex Parte Cordova
235 S.W.3d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Ex Parte Taylor
957 S.W.2d 43 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dillard, Steven Dale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-steven-dale-texcrimapp-2023.