Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance

508 F.2d 331
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 1975
DocketNo. 74-2020
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 508 F.2d 331 (Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance, 508 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In 1969 I. Boyd Ridgeway was developing a shopping center in Tyler, Texas in joint venture with defendant Mayflower Investment Company [Mayflower], Defendant Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company [Fidelity], of which Mayflower was a subsidiary, was to secure financing for the project. Plaintiff, Dillard Department Stores, Inc. [Dillard] contracted with Ridgeway for space in the Tyler center. The project collapsed and Dillard arranged to lease from another developer. It sued defendants for actual damages and exemplary damages for fraud. The jury awarded Dillard actual damages of $470 against each defendant and $469,175 in exemplary damages from Fidelity.

Defendants filed a motion for a remit-titur of exemplary damages, or, if the remittitur were unacceptable to plaintiff, for a new trial. Plaintiff made a motion which in part asked for a new trial on the issue of actual damages for both defendants. The district court judge ordered a new trial on all issues. Appellants, Fidelity and Mayflower, and cross-appellant, Dillard, appeal this order and contest the denial of their respective motions.

This Court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal at this stage in the proceedings. “An order granting a [332]*332new trial is generally not appealable because such an order is interlocutory and not a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. ... If a new trial is granted and results in a new final judgment, the appeal is to be taken from it.” Wiggs v. Courshon, 5 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 1281, 1282. See also, Citizens Nat’l Bank v. Speer, 5 Cir. 1955, 220 F.2d 889.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 F.2d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillard-department-stores-inc-v-fidelity-union-life-insurance-ca5-1975.