Dill v. Wood

1 Johns. Cas. 394
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 394 (Dill v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dill v. Wood, 1 Johns. Cas. 394 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defect of the jury process was owing to the mistake of the plaintiff’s attorney, and the defendant was under no obligation to come to trialon- such process, nor had the plaintiff any right to require it of him. The defendant- must take his rule.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-wood-nysupct-1800.