Dill v. Wheeler

77 N.E. 789, 185 N.Y. 106, 23 Bedell 106, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 878
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 77 N.E. 789 (Dill v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dill v. Wheeler, 77 N.E. 789, 185 N.Y. 106, 23 Bedell 106, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 878 (N.Y. 1906).

Opinion

Cullen, Ch. J.

The relator was appointed a battalion chief in the fire department of the city of Buffalo on July *107 lltli, 1904. The municipal civil service commission refused to certify to relator’s pay because he had not taken a competitive examination and his name not been placed on the eligible list for that position. Thereupon he applied for a writ of mandamus to the civil service commission requiring it to reclassify the position held by him and place the same in the exempt class and to certify to his salary. The application was denied at Special Term, and the order entered thereon was affirmed by the Appellate Division.

While we have hold in the case of People ex rel. Schau v. McWilliams (ante, p. 92) that mandamus is the appropriate remedy to correct an illegal or erroneous classification by the civil service commission, the views there expressed, that the position or office of battalion chief in the fire department of Buffalo is one of that character the classification of which rests in the discretion and judgment of the civil service commission and is not properly the subject of review by the courts, dispose of this application.

The order of the Appellate Division must, therefore, be affirmed, but, under the circumstances, without costs to either party in this court.

O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ., concur; Hiscook, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bischoff v. County of Wayne
31 N.W.2d 798 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1948)
People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBride
185 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
People Ex Rel. Peixotto v. . Bd. of Education
106 N.E. 307 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
Cook v. Civil Service Commission
117 P. 663 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Hammond v. Ricker
140 A.D. 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Peters v. Adam
106 N.Y.S. 158 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
People ex rel. Quinn v. Voorhis
115 A.D. 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.E. 789, 185 N.Y. 106, 23 Bedell 106, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-wheeler-ny-1906.