Dill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dill v. State

134 S.E. 201, 35 Ga. App. 587, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1012

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1926

Docket17358

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 201 (Dill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dill v. State, 134 S.E. 201, 35 Ga. App. 587, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1012 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

1. The judge did not err in overruling the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, as the evidence was impeaching in its character, and there was also a counter-showing .(as to some of this evidence) by the State.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyles, C. J.

1. The judge did not err in overruling the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, as the evidence was impeaching in its character, and there was also a counter-showing .(as to some of this evidence) by the State.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E. 201, 35 Ga. App. 587, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-state-gactapp-1926.