Dill v. Egan

Third Circuit

Dill v. Egan

292 F.2d 839

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 18, 1961·No. No. 13433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We will assume arguendo that this proceeding was not rendered moot by the untimely death of the respondent, Judge Thomas C. Egan, on July 6, 1961. The issues attempted to be presented by this application are of a serious nature which should be dealt with or adjudicated on appeal, should they actually arise, in the case of Dill v. Scuka, C.A. No. 20539 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Accordingly we will deny the application for a writ of mandamus or prohibition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We will assume arguendo that this proceeding was not rendered moot by the untimely death of the respondent, Judge Thomas C. Egan, on July 6, 1961. The issues attempted to be presented by this application are of a serious nature which should be dealt with or adjudicated on appeal, should they actually arise, in the case of Dill v. Scuka, C.A. No. 20539 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Accordingly we will deny the application for a writ of mandamus or prohibition.

Dill v. Egan, 292 F.2d 839 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

292 F.2d 839 (Dill v. Egan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related