Dill v. Dill
183 A. 172, 119 N.J. Eq. 467, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 637
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 374.
For affirmance —Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Case, Heher, Hetfield, Rafferty, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dill v. Dill, 183 A. 172, 119 N.J. Eq. 467, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 637 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 172 (Dill v. Dill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Churik
397 A.2d 677 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Seylaz v. Bennett
74 A.2d 309 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)
Blake v. Brennan
61 A.2d 916 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Stiles v. Newschwander
49 A.2d 572 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
In Re Chryssikos
39 A.2d 104 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1944)
Hanstein v. Kelly
24 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)