Dill v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 65, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2040
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 1925
DocketDocket No. 4563.
StatusPublished
This text of 3 B.T.A. 65 (Dill v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dill v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 65, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2040 (bta 1925).
Opinion
[66]*66DECISION.
The profit on the sale of the dwelling house and the dividends on the stock should be accounted for as income of the partnership. Depreciation on the lumber mill is allowed at 10 per cent. The deficiency should be computed accordingly. Final determination will be settled on 10 days’ notice, under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Appeal of Dill
3 B.T.A. 65 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 65, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-commissioner-bta-1925.