Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey
87 S.E. 1010, 103 S.C. 233, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 20
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 28, 1916
Docket9275
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 87 S.E. 1010 (Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey, 87 S.E. 1010, 103 S.C. 233, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1916).
Opinion
February 28, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The order of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, is affirmed, for the reasons therein stated. *Page 238
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richardson Construction Co. v. Meek Engineering & Construction Inc.
262 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1980)
Seubert v. Buchanan
156 S.E.2d 633 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1967)
Abraham v. New York Underwriters Insurance
196 S.E. 531 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Cannon v. Haverty Furniture Co.
183 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Laurens Trust Co. v. Copeland
151 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Still
138 S.E. 401 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 1010, 103 S.C. 233, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-ball-co-v-bailey-sc-1916.