Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey
87 S.E. 1010, 103 S.C. 233, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 20
Opinion
February 28, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The order of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, is affirmed, for the reasons therein stated. *Page 238
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey, 87 S.E. 1010, 103 S.C. 233, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1916).
87 S.E. 1010 (Dill-Ball Co. v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson Construction Co. v. Meek Engineering & Construction Inc.
262 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1980)
Seubert v. Buchanan
156 S.E.2d 633 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1967)
Abraham v. New York Underwriters Insurance
196 S.E. 531 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Cannon v. Haverty Furniture Co.
183 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Laurens Trust Co. v. Copeland
151 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Still
138 S.E. 401 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)