Dilks v. Kelsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dilks v. Kelsey

63 A. 1118, 73 N.J.L. 678, 44 Vroom 678, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 18, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 A. 1118 (Dilks v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dilks v. Kelsey, 63 A. 1118, 73 N.J.L. 678, 44 Vroom 678, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103 (N.J. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A. 1118, 73 N.J.L. 678, 44 Vroom 678, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilks-v-kelsey-nj-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack