Dilks v. Kelsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dilks v. Kelsey

63 A. 1118, 73 N.J.L. 678, 44 Vroom 678, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Dilks v. Kelsey, 63 A. 1118, 73 N.J.L. 678, 44 Vroom 678, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103 (N.J. 1906).

Pincite

63 A. 1118 (Dilks v. Kelsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related