Diljohn v. Honigsberg
785 So. 2d 762, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7747, 2001 WL 608862
This text of 785 So. 2d 762 (Diljohn v. Honigsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diljohn v. Honigsberg, 785 So. 2d 762, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7747, 2001 WL 608862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Affirmed. See National Enters., Inc. v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc., 777 So.2d 1191, 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“A showing of ‘[g]ood cause requires some contact with the opposing party and some form of excusable conduct or occurrence which arose other than through negligence or inattention to pleading deadlines.’ ”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
NEI v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc.
777 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
785 So. 2d 762, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7747, 2001 WL 608862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diljohn-v-honigsberg-fladistctapp-2001.