Diljohn v. Honigsberg

785 So. 2d 762, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7747, 2001 WL 608862
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1481·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See National Enters., Inc. v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc., 777 So.2d 1191, 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“A showing of ‘[g]ood cause requires some contact with the opposing party and some form of excusable conduct or occurrence which arose other than through negligence or inattention to pleading deadlines.’ ”)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diljohn v. Honigsberg, 785 So. 2d 762, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7747, 2001 WL 608862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 762 (Diljohn v. Honigsberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NEI v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc.
777 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)