DiLeonardo v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DiLeonardo v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

627 So. 2d 1334, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12399, 1993 WL 517267

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1993·No. No. 92-3441·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision of the appeals referee and the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying benefits to appellant. The appeals referee heard the testimony presented, weighed the evidence and resolved conflicts in the testimony against the appellant. The credibility of witnesses and testimony is a matter for the referee to decide as the finder of fact, and this court cannot reweigh the evidence if the decision is sup[1335]*1335ported by competent, substantial evidence. Maynard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 609 So.2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision of the appeals referee and the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying benefits to appellant. The appeals referee heard the testimony presented, weighed the evidence and resolved conflicts in the testimony against the appellant. The credibility of witnesses and testimony is a matter for the referee to decide as the finder of fact, and this court cannot reweigh the evidence if the decision is sup[1335]*1335ported by competent, substantial evidence. Maynard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 609 So.2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

DiLeonardo v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 627 So. 2d 1334, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12399, 1993 WL 517267 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

627 So. 2d 1334 (DiLeonardo v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related