Dilda v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Dilda v. Smith

35 S.E. 122, 110 Ga. 308, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 392

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 30, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 122 (Dilda v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dilda v. Smith, 35 S.E. 122, 110 Ga. 308, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 392 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Cobb, J.

There .was no appearance for 'the plaintiff in error, and the defendant in error moved to open the record and prayed for damages. It palpably appearing that the bill of exceptions is without merit, this fact, in connection with the failure of the plaintiff in error to prosecute his case, leads logically to the conclusion that it was brought here for delay only; and damages are awarded accordingly. Buchannon v. DeLoach Mill Mfg, Co., 105 Ga. 840, and cit.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

There .was no appearance for 'the plaintiff in error, and the defendant in error moved to open the record and prayed for damages. It palpably appearing that the bill of exceptions is without merit, this fact, in connection with the failure of the plaintiff in error to prosecute his case, leads logically to the conclusion that it was brought here for delay only; and damages are awarded accordingly. Buchannon v. DeLoach Mill Mfg, Co., 105 Ga. 840, and cit.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 S.E. 122, 110 Ga. 308, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilda-v-smith-ga-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack