Dilberto v. Harris

23 S.E. 112, 95 Ga. 571
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 112 (Dilberto v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dilberto v. Harris, 23 S.E. 112, 95 Ga. 571 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

[571]*571 Judgment affirmed.

[572]*572October 15, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Certiorari. Before Judge Bartlett. Bibb superior court. November term, 1893. The suit was on an account for “ one black derby hat of the value of $5.” Plaintiff testified, that he entered defendant’s barber-shop to be shaved, and gave his coat and hat to a little boy who placed them on the rack with coats and hats of other men being shaved. After being shaved, plaintiff' discovered that his hat had been taken and another like it but of different size left in its place. On defendant’s attention being called, he stated that he would use every effort to recover the hat taken. Some days afterward, plaintiff' called on defendant, and finding that his own hat had not been recovered, and that the other was still in defendant’s possession, demanded that defendant either get him another hat or pay him the value of it; which was refused. Plaintiff' paid $5 for a hat he bought to replace the one he lost. Defendant testified, that he had no control of the missing hat, and that it was not delivered to him nor to the boy (who was not in the shop when plaintiff' came in), but was put on the rack by plaintiff'. Defendant and his employees were then engaged in shaving customers, all the chairs being occupied. As soon as one was vacated, plaintiff took it and was shaved, and upon leaving'it, claimed that his hat was not among those left on the rack. .Verdict for plaintiff".was sustained on certiorari. Freeman & Griswold, for plaintiff" in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynie v. a & H Camper Sales, Inc.
208 S.E.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Southern Aero, Inc. v. Jordan
116 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. Wheeler
49 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Elliott v. Levy
49 S.E.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Southeastern Fair Asso. v. Ford
14 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Loeb Compress Co. v. I. G. Bromberg & Co.
140 S.W. 475 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Vogelsang v. Fredkyn
133 Ill. App. 356 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Walpert v. Bohan
55 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E. 112, 95 Ga. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilberto-v-harris-ga-1894.