Dilberth v. State
267 So. 2d 661, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 1972·No. No. 72-428·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of robbery. The evidence established that he stabbed his victim and was apprehended a short time later near the scene of the crime. He had blood on his clothes. He was identified by the victim.
On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence of the identity of the defendant as [662]*662the perpetrator of the crime is insufficient. We have determined that this contention has no merit. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dilberth v. State, 267 So. 2d 661, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
267 So. 2d 661 (Dilberth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brookins v. State
343 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)