Dilberth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dilberth v. State

267 So. 2d 661, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 1972

DocketNo. 72-428

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 So. 2d 661 (Dilberth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dilberth v. State, 267 So. 2d 661, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of robbery. The evidence established that he stabbed his victim and was apprehended a short time later near the scene of the crime. He had blood on his clothes. He was identified by the victim.

On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence of the identity of the defendant as [662]*662the perpetrator of the crime is insufficient. We have determined that this contention has no merit. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of robbery. The evidence established that he stabbed his victim and was apprehended a short time later near the scene of the crime. He had blood on his clothes. He was identified by the victim.

On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence of the identity of the defendant as [662]*662the perpetrator of the crime is insufficient. We have determined that this contention has no merit. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 So. 2d 661, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilberth-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack