Dilbeck v. Francis

1917 OK 59, 162 P. 488, 63 Okla. 78, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 494
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 9, 1917·No. 8831·Published

Opinion

*79 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in' error brought this action in the district court of McClain county against defendants in error to have set aside and canceled certain deeds and mortgages and to quiet title to certain described lands. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendants. Motion for new trial was overruled on June 27, 1916. Petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on December 28, 1916.

It is urged that this appeal should be dismissed because not brought within the time •provided by statute. It clearly appears that 1lie appeal was not brought within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed, and for that reason the appeal is dismissed. Colter v. Martin. 43 Okla. 618, 143 Pac. 660; Comanche Mer. Co. v. Curlee Clothing Co., 44 Okla. 73, 143 Pac. 190; Phillips v. Dillingham, 44 Okla. 102, 144 Pac. 363.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dilbeck v. Francis, 1917 OK 59, 162 P. 488, 63 Okla. 78, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 494 (Okla. 1917).

1917 OK 59 (Dilbeck v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comanche Mercantile Co. v. Curlee Clothing Co.
1914 OK 430 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Colter v. Martin
1914 OK 467 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Phillips v. Dillingham
1914 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)