Dilatush v. Prown
147 A. 917, 7 N.J. Misc. 914, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112
This text of 147 A. 917 (Dilatush v. Prown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dilatush v. Prown, 147 A. 917, 7 N.J. Misc. 914, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The only reason urged for setting aside the verdicts of the plaintiffs Anna H. Dilatush and E. Louise Dilatush is that they are excessive. We do not find them to be so. Both received painful injuries, some of which are permanent.
The rule is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
147 A. 917, 7 N.J. Misc. 914, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilatush-v-prown-nj-1929.