Dikes v. De Cordova

Texas Supreme Court

Dikes v. De Cordova

17 Tex. 618

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 Tex. 618 (Dikes v. De Cordova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dikes v. De Cordova, 17 Tex. 618 (Tex. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

There manifestly is no error in the judgment. The certificate of the Notary shows that the answers of the plaintiff to the interrogatories propounded to him by the defendants, were sworn to and subscribed before the officer; and the certificate is strictly in conformity to the statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 739.) The answers were filed more than a year before the trial; and the motion to reject certain of them, and take the interrogatories as confessed for the want of an answer, came too late. (8 Tex. R. 129.) ' The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler, J.

There manifestly is no error in the judgment. The certificate of the Notary shows that the answers of the plaintiff to the interrogatories propounded to him by the defendants, were sworn to and subscribed before the officer; and the certificate is strictly in conformity to the statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 739.) The answers were filed more than a year before the trial; and the motion to reject certain of them, and take the interrogatories as confessed for the want of an answer, came too late. (8 Tex. R. 129.) ' The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Tex. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dikes-v-de-cordova-tex-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack