Dikambi v. City University of New York

Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 12/07/2021

JUDITH SANDRINE DIKAMBI, Plaintiff, No. 19-CV-9937 (RA) v. ORDER CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, DR. CARLTON J. ADAMS, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On December 6, 2021, Defendant City University of New York (“CUNY”) moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. 104. CUNY contemporaneously moved to stay discovery pending the Court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss. Dkt. 107. Having considered the relevant factors—the breadth of discovery sought, the burden of responding to it, the prejudice that would result to the party opposing the stay, and the strength of the pending motion, see Republic of Turkey v. Christie’s, Inc., 316 F. Supp. 3d 675, 677 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)—the Court finds that a stay is not warranted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at docket number 107.

SO ORDERED. Dated: | December 7, 2021 {7 New York, New York KA Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge