Home/New York Court of Appeals/DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.

575 N.E.2d 395, 77 N.Y.2d 986, 571 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 799
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the November 20, 1990 Appellate Division order that affirmed the amended judgment, dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff, having stipulated to reduce the amount of [987]*987damages to which he is entitled, is not a party aggrieved (see, Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448, 457); motion otherwise dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the November 20, 1990 order that affirmed the denial of the motion for resettlement and the February 7, 1991 Appellate Division order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cross motion for leave to appeal from that portion of the November 20, 1990 Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion for vacatur dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc., 575 N.E.2d 395, 77 N.Y.2d 986, 571 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 799 (N.Y. 1991).

575 N.E.2d 395 (DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parkin v. Cornell University, Inc.
80 N.Y.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)