Diguette, Dana Marie v. State
Opinion
______
Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 6, 2012
in The QEourt of Z1pptat if ittlj itrftt of Z!xa at atta No. 05-11-0 1274-CR
1)ANA NI. 1)IGUETTE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court Auxiliary Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TR-i1-13323
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Befoie Justices O’Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
Dana M. Diguette was convicted of contributing to the non-attendance of her child at
school. The trial court assessed a $400 fine. Appellant is representing herself in this appeal and
did not file a brief. Therefore, we submitted the appeal without briefs. See Lou v. State, 874
S.W.2d 687 (Tc. Crim. App. 1994). Absent briefs, no issues are before us. Finding no fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
‘ 2gç 4 .:’7W :“, ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEx. it App. P.47 111 274F.U05 Qtourt of Ztppeat ififtlj Oitrict of rcxa at Oafta JUDGMENT
[)ANA M. DIGUETTE, Appellant Appeal Irom the County Court Auxiliary Court No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas No. 05-1 1-01274-CR V. (Tr.Ct.No. TR-1 1-13323). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices O’Neill and FitzGerald participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.
Judgment entered November 6, 20 12
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diguette, Dana Marie v. State (Diguette, Dana Marie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.