Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker)

Nevada Supreme Court

Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 2020·No. 81283·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DIGNITY HEALTH, D/B/A ST. ROSE No. 81283 DOMINICAN HEALTH-SAN MARTIN CAMPUS; AND ST. ROSE DOMINICAN MEDICAL PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FILED Petitioners, vs. OCT t 5 2020 THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, C EF r MI FAI RT

BY .

o-44-ipek

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEPUlY CLERK 0 --- CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and GEOFF WALKER, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss a tort action. Having considered the petition, answer, and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (explaining that this

c26-3 7928

court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

"44;_5GA...0 , J.

Stiglich

, J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DIGNITY HEALTH, D/B/A ST. ROSE No. 81283 DOMINICAN HEALTH-SAN MARTIN CAMPUS; AND ST. ROSE DOMINICAN MEDICAL PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FILED Petitioners, vs. OCT t 5 2020 THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, C EF r MI FAI RT

BY .

o-44-ipek

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEPUlY CLERK 0 --- CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and GEOFF WALKER, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss a tort action. Having considered the petition, answer, and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (explaining that this

c26-3 7928

court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

"44;_5GA...0 , J.

Stiglich

, J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker), (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker) (Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related