Dignan v. Gilbert
43 Ill. App. 536, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 416
Opinion
This is a ridiculous case. There is a paper in it called a bill of exceptions, but there is no exception to anything in it. The clerk has recited upon the record that a motion for a new trial was made and refused, and that the defendants, appellants, excepted; but such recital goes for nothing. The only quarrel is with the finding upon the facts. Foreman v. Johnson, 37 Ill. App. 452.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dignan v. Gilbert, 43 Ill. App. 536, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 416 (Ill. Ct. App. 1891).
43 Ill. App. 536 (Dignan v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henline v. Popejoy
101 Ill. App. 153 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)