Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc.
This text of Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc. (Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DIGITAL ALLY, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corpora- tion, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2014-1420 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:13-cv-02550-SAC-KGS, Senior Judge Sam A. Crow. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
DAVID S. MORELAND, Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by NATHAN SLOAN, STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/digital-ally-inc-v-utility-associates-inc-cafc-2015.