DiGiorgio v. Hempstead Realty Associates
This text of 202 A.D.2d 332 (DiGiorgio v. Hempstead Realty Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on or about January 28, 1993, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action for personal injury allegedly sustained as the result of a slip and fall on a wet portion on the floor in the area leading out of defendants’ public restroom, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue as to either defendants’ creation of the condition or actual or constructive notice of its existence. Defendant M & O Enterprises’ president denied actual knowledge of the condition, and plaintiff testified that she did not see the water on the floor when she entered the restroom and did not know how long it had been there, or how long the automatic hand dryers had been inoperable (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 332, 609 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/digiorgio-v-hempstead-realty-associates-nyappdiv-1994.